Legal Opinion · Dissent

S. G. B. Steel Scaffolding & Shoring Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 6, 1974No. 5542; C.A.D. 1123Published

1DissentMiller, Judge

Although the horizontal bars and cross-braces cause the merchandise in question to be more than single pole shores, that fact does not prevent its classification under item 664.10 as lifting machinery. This court, in holding that single pole, adjustable shores were “machines” for purposes of paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930, quoted with approval the following definition of “machine”:

Any device consisting of two or more resistant, relatively constrained parts, which, by a certain predetermined intermotion, may serve to transmit and modify force and motion so as to produce some given…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Flex Track Equipment Ltd.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  2. Brauner v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API