Legal Opinion

People v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 13, 1990PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s claim that the prosecutor exercised a peremptory challenge in a discriminatory manner to excuse a black person from the jury (see, Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79). Although defendant made a prima facie showing of discrimination by demonstrating that *904the prosecutor removed four of six prospective black jurors (see, People v Burnett, 152 AD2d 910), the prosecution proffered specific, race-neutral reasons for excusing the one challenged juror (see, Batson v Kentucky, supra, at 96-97; People v Hernandez, 75 NY2d 350; People…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. HernandezNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. People v. BurnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API