Legal Opinion
Bruhn v. Foley
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided June 3, 1993No. 7:CV92-5007PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
PIESTER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff filed this action alleging defendants failed to hire her on account of her gender in violation of: (1) the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII); (2) 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and (3) the Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act. See Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 48-1101 et seq. (Reissue 1988). 1 Trial was held in North Platte, Nebraska commencing on January 26, 1993 and continuing for 3 days. 2 At the close of plaintiffs case defendants made a motion for directed verdict which was taken under advisement. For reasons stated more fully below, I…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Meyer v. Lincoln Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2004
- Portee v. HastavaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Ilsemann v. St. Charles County, MissouriDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
- Seelig v. Ramsey County, MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2025