Legal Opinion
Londa v. Estates
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 16, 1976PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the case remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for review of the facts pursuant to CPLR 5613. A jury question as to negligence was presented under the rule of the recently decided status cases. (Basso v Miller, 40 NY2d 233; Scurti v City of New York, 40 NY2d 433; Barker v Parnossa, Inc., 39 NY2d 926; Parish v Henneberry Road Farms, 39 NY2d 932.) Hence, it was error for the Appellate Division to reverse, on the law, the judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff. We do not, of course, by this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Basso v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Scurti v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Barker v. Parnossa, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Parish v. Henneberry Road Farms, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sewar v. Gagliardi Bros. ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Sakin v. FrymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Zaepfel v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Dreyer v. Tishman Realty & Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Landgrebe v. Peekskill Community HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.