Legal Opinion

Strong v. M'Donald

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 15, 1792PublishedCited by 1 opinion

PetitioN in chancery; showing, that they executed a certain bond to said M’Donald for £1,000, dated the 29 day of May, A. D. 1790, conditioned, that said Strong should perform certain things within eighteen months, which were set forth particularly; and that he had performed them within said eighteen months; and pray that said M’Donald be compelled to deliver up said bond to be canceled.

Read the full summary

PetitioN in chancery; showing, that they executed a certain bond to said M’Donald for £1,000, dated the 29 day of May, A. D. 1790, conditioned, that said Strong should perform certain things within eighteen months, which were set forth particularly; and that he had performed them within said eighteen months; and pray that said M’Donald be compelled to deliver up said bond to be canceled. Petition dated the 19th of November A. D. 1791. Plea in abatement — 1st. That the said Strong and said M’Donald were both inhabitants of the state of New York. 2d. That said eighteen months had not elapsed…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment — That the plea in abatement is sufficient, and that the petitioners take nothing by their petition.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. BoydMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API