Legal Opinion

Sivak v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1989No. 17667PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Lacey Sivak, a prison inmate who was briefly incarcerated at the Ada County jail, seeks our review of a district court order dismissing his appeal from a magistrate’s order which denied his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Although the case has been captioned as “Lacey Sivak v. State of Idaho,” Sivak’s petition was directed at Ada County. Sivak alleged that when he became involved in an altercation with another jail inmate, the jail authorities put him on “lockdown” status without a hearing. The petition further alleged that prisoners on “lockdown” status were afforded fewer privileges…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WolfeIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Mallery v. LewisIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Russell v. FortneyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Wright v. DermittIdaho Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Storm v. SpauldingIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Sivak v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. State v. MagillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Charter Lakeside Behavioral Health v. Tennessee Health Facilities Comm.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API