City of Grand Rapids v. Williams
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from superior court of Grand Rapids; Burlingame, J. George Williams was convicted of violating an ordinance relative to disorderly persons.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The respondent was convicted of a violation of section 1 of an ordinance of the city of Grand *248Rapids, entitled “An ordinance relative to disorderly-persons,” which reads: “ All persons who * * * shall be engaged in any illegal or improper diversion, or shall use any indecent, insulting, or immoral language, or shall be guilty of any indecent, insulting, or immoral conduct, or behavior, in any public street or elsewhere in said city, * * * shall be deemed to be disorderly persons, and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished,” etc.
The complaint, omitting the parts purely formal, reads as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Grand Rapids v. BatemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Quin v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- United States v. FosterU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
- Deboard v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
- In re StegengaMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Phillips v. City of AberdeenMississippi Supreme Court · 1940