Legal Opinion

Millan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 18, 2009No. 3D08-3227Published

1Per curiam

David Millan’s Petition for Writ of Ha-beas Corpus is denied. It is unlikely the outcome of this case would have been different but for the alleged omission that Millan claims was made by his appellate counsel. The error, if any, is harmless. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); see Millan v. State, 932 So.2d 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

Petition denied.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Millan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006