Legal Opinion

Bauer v. Phelps

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1929Published

1Opinion of the CourtCotillo, J.

Plaintiff (1) moves under rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice to strike out as sham the separate defense contained in paragraphs 10 and 11 of defendant’s answer; (2) to strike out as sham and insufficient in law the separate defense alleged in paragraphs 12 to 16, inclusive; (3) to dismiss the counterclaim set up in paragraphs 12 to 16, inclusive, on the ground that such matter is not properly interposable as a counterclaim in this action; (4) to strike out the entire answer as sham and as interposed solely for the purpose of delay and for judgment pursuant to section 476 of the Civil…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Robinson v. WhitakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  3. Continental Securities Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Gilboy v. LennonNew York Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API