Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Pate

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 1990No. 8912SC555PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Plaintiffs’ sole assignment of error is whether the trial court committed reversible error by granting summary judgment in favor of defendants based on a finding that G.S. 39-13.1 or G.S. 52-8 cured the failure of the certifying officer to find and certify that the deed was not unreasonable or injurious to a subscribing wife. Plaintiffs agree that summary judgment is appropriate but argue that the evidence and stipulated facts would require entry of summary judgment in their favor. First, plaintiffs argue that G.S. 39-13.1 (a) purports to cure only an instrument “ ‘which is in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Mansour v. RabilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Caldwell v. . BlountSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Boone v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Barber v. Woodmen of the World Life Insurance SocietyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dunn v. PateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API