Legal Opinion

Jones v. Fales

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 15, 1809PublishedCited by 13 opinions

This action [Vide ante, Vol. 4, 245.] was again tried before the Chief Justice, at the last November term, in this county.

1Opinion of the CourtParsons, C. J.

The admission of paroi evidence by the judge to prove the contents of certain promissory notes said to be lost is objected to on exceptions filed by the defendant; and for this cause a new trial is moved for.

After hearing the parties, we are all satisfied that the evidence was properly admitted. By law the plaintiffs, after they had been delivered to the jury in evidence, had no longer the custody of the notes; but they were intrusted to the care of the clerk of this court; and it appeared from his testimony that they were lost, and that he could not find them. This was a proper case to let…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dwyer v. BrannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pipes v. NortonMississippi Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Witter v. LathamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1837
  3. Cobb v. TirrellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  4. Palmer v. LoganIllinois Supreme Court · 1841
  5. Torrey v. FossSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1855

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API