Legal Opinion

Kelly v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 24, 1881PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Apjieal by defendant from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Wilkin, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.'

1Opinion of the Court

DiciciNsoN, J.*

This action was brought to recover damages, upon the ground of negligence, for injuries to the person of the plaintiff, and to his horses and wagon, caused by a collision with a train of cars of the defendant, at the crossing of its line of road over Third street, in the city of St. Paul. The plaintiff having recovered a verdict, the questions are presented, upon this appeal from an order refusing a new trial, whether the defendant was shown by the evidence to have been chargeable with negligence in the premises, and whether it does not appear that the plaintiff was guilty of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. . N.Y.C. and Hudson R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Brown v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  3. Davis v. . N.Y.C. and H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Eilert v. Green Bay & Minnesota RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Duffy v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. WalbornIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Randall v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  3. Norris v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. City of Elkins v. Western Maryland Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Bolinger v. St. Paul & Duluth Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API