Pierson v. Linn
Appellate Court of Illinois
Assnnipsit, on a promissory note. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Bureau County; the Hon. Charles Blanchard, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1901.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Dibble
delivered the opinion of the court.
At the April term, 1899, of the court below, Elizabeth Pierson recovered a judgment by confession against Swan Linn and Alfred Pierson, alleged in the declaration to be partners, engaged in the mercantile business, doing business at Spring Valley under the firm name “ Linn & Pierson, ” and at Princeton under the firm name “ Swan Linn & Co.” Execution was issued upon the judgment. At the next term, on motion of Linn, the judgment was opened and the execution was stayed, and leave was given Linn to plead. It is argued it was error…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mumford v. TolmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Farwell v. HustonIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Hier v. KaufmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Blake v. State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Packer v. RobertsIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cantwell v. CantwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
- Alton Banking & Trust Co. v. GrayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930
- Cantwell v. CantwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1957