Beatty Ex Rel. Beatty v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
We first note that the order in the present case addresses only two of the three defendants in this cause of action. An order which does not adjudicate the rights and liabilities of all of the parties is interlocutory and not generally subject to appeal. Smith v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Ins. Co., 96 N.C. App. 215, 385 S.E.2d 152 (1989), disc. rev. denied, 326 N.C. 365, 389 S.E.2d 816 (1990). However, the trial court, pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 54(b) (1983), expressly certified that there was no just reason for delay of this appeal. We therefore proceed to address the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Overcash v. Statesville City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Smith v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
3Cited by23 opinions
- Herring v. Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Crowell v. School District No. 7Montana Supreme Court · 1991
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Hallman v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Magana v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.