Legal Opinion

Miller v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1981No. 13884PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WATKINS, Judge.

This is a suit brought by Leroy Miller to recover for the destruction by fire of a certain tenant dwelling owned by plaintiff, which loss plaintiff contends was covered by a fire insurance policy issued by Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, England. Defendant contends there was no coverage because the policy described the property as “owner occupied” and because the property had been “vacant or unoccupied” for more than 60 days in violation of the “permission granted clause” in the policy. The trial court found there was coverage under the policy, and rendered judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tiner v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  2. Security Transfer Co. v. Insured Lloyds Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Burrell v. Seguros America Banamex, SALouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Boyette v. Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Burrell v. Seguros America Banamex, S.A.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nautilus Insurance Co v. Bethel Apartments IncDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API