Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jones, Et Vir v. Hammock Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 4, 1937Published

1DissentBuford, J.

(dissenting).—This is an appeal from a final decree finding usury to exist in a certain note and mortgage, the renewal and the extension thereof, and applying the statutory penalty to the lender by ordering the note and mortgage, the renewal and extension thereof cancelled of record.

In response to a newspaper advertisement, Mrs. Jesse Sewell Jones, on July 21, 1927, loaned to Warren Ham mock and Julia R. Hammock the sum of $4,750.00 taking therefor their note in the sum of $5,000.00, due in three years, bearing interest at the rate of 8%, secured by a mortgage of even date on the following…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. De Wolf v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. Chandler and Chandler v. KendrickSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. Clark v. GreySupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  4. Tucker v. FoutsSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  5. Ector v. OsborneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API