State v. Langlade County Creamery Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Stevens, J.(1) Defendant’s first ground for the abatement of the action is that sec. 352.36 of the Statutes does not apply to the manufacture of Emmenthaier cheese because the word “cheese” as used in this statute applies only to American or cheddar cheese and does not apply to special brands like American Swiss or Emmenthaier cheese. We cannot believe that it was the legislative intent to give the word “cheese” as used in this statute so narrow or limited a meaning.(2) Defendant’s second ground for an abatement of the action is based upon the contention that the filled-cheese statute (sec.…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Assessors of Boston v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- State ex rel. Sullivan v. DammannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Wipperfurth v. U-Haul Co. of Western Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Wipperfurth v. U-Haul Co. of Western Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981