Legal Opinion

Lubowicki v. Oxford Resources Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 23, 1997No. 96-1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant argues that genuine issues of material fact preclude the entry of summary judgment against him. We agree and reverse.

Appellant had taken a car leased from Oxford Resources Corporation into a third-party repair shop for minor repairs. While the car was in the repair shop’s possession, the parties renewed an automobile leasing agreement between them. When Appellant learned that the car had been severely van*925dalized at the repair shop, he refused to take possession of the ear and faded to make lease payments to Oxford.

Oxford sued Appellant, alleging that Appellant owed it the lease…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. MorrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Langbein v. ComerfordDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  3. Cufferi v. Royal Palm Development Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. Chappell, Et Ux. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  5. State Road Dept. v. Houdaille Industries, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. St. Mary's Hospital, Inc. v. SchocoffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Star2star Communications, LLC v. AMG Group of Brunswick, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API