Legal Opinion

Gersich v. Starich

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.

The cause was submitted on both sides upon printed briefs. Though the trial court made findings of fact which he declares shall take the place of the verdict, and though the appellant’s attorney correctly states that the verdict is advisory merely, yet his whole brief is devoted to sustaining the proposition that the verdict entitles plaintiff to judgment.

The verdict being advisory merely, it became the duty of the court to make findings of fact. Northwestern Nat. Bank v. Ramsey, 96 Wis. 544, 549, 71 N. W. 939. Such findings set aside and superseded the verdict in so far as' they differed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Callanan v. JuddWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Harrison v. Juneau BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Gunn v. MadiganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Northwesthern National Bank v. RamseyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. SchuerbrockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Muckler v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API