Frankel Group, Inc. v. BA Mortgage & International Realty, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm the trial court’s denial of codefendant’s motion for transfer of venue in this suit for commissions by a real estate broker, whose business office is located in Hillsborough County. We agree with the apparent ruling of the trial court that the alleged cause of action arose in Hillsborough County because this is a suit on an alleged obligation to pay money and, since apparently no place of payment was expressly agreed upon, payment is to be made where the payee maintains its business office. See U.S.H. Properties Corp. v. Intercoastal Investments, Inc., 331 So.2d 385, 387 (Fla. 2d…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Carter Realty v. Roper Bros. LandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- USH Properties Corp. v. INTERCOASTAL INVEST. INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sunshine Yacht Sales v. Anslow Yacht SalesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996