Legal Opinion
Boyles v. Boyles
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided May 31, 1983No. 671A82Published
1Opinion of the Court
302 S.E.2d 790 (1983)
Alma Christine BOYLES
v.
Paul W. BOYLES.
No. 671A82.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
May 31, 1983.
Douglas F. DeBank, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant.
Sanford, Adams, McCullough & Beard by Charles H. Montgomery and Cynthia Wittmer West, Cary, for defendant-appellee.
FRYE, Justice.
The question with which we are presented is whether a North Carolina court is bound to accord full faith and credit to a default judgment for alimony arrearages rendered by a Florida court when the defendant in the action did not receive actual notice of the Florida court proceeding and the plaintiff's…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Durfee v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Underwriters National Assurance Co. v. North Carolina Life & Accident & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.