Legal Opinion

Ballard v. City of Fort Worth

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 20, 1933No. 12845PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONNER, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from an instructed verdict and judgment in a suit instituted by appellant to recover damages in a large amount for injuries alleged to have been received by him while at work for the city in one of the pipes of the city’s sewer lines.

He alleged that he was inexperienced in such work, without knowledge of its dangers, and that, while doing that which he had been directed to do, he was seriously asphyxiated by noxious and poisonous gases generated in the pipe in which he was at work that proximately resulted in the injuries set forth in his petition.

Appellant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whitfield v. City of ParisTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. White v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. City of Wichita Falls v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Wiggins v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. City of Wichita Falls v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City of Dallas v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. City of Fort Worth v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Pontarelli Trust Ex Rel. Pontarelli v. City of McAllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Bowie v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Gregory v. City of GarlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API