Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jacob Oberson, Inc. v. Seyopp Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 7, 1937Published

1Dissent

O’Malley, J. (dissenting).

I am unable to agree with the conclusion reached by Mr. Justice Glennon. Park avenue and Fourth avenue are (within the purview of the statute) to be regarded as one street and avenue. Mere “ difference in nomenclature ” may not alter the factual situation. This was the effect of our decision in Matter of Frank v. Hub Liquors, Inc. (244 App. Div. 496; affd., 268 N. Y. 688).

If because of difference in name merely the two streets here in question are to be regarded as different thoroughfares, then a license may be issued to the premises at the southwesterly corner of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of O'Brien v. RozzaNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. O'Brien v. RozzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  3. Matter of Frank v. LiquorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Frank v. Hub Liquors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API