Legal Opinion

Potter v. Walker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 25, 1937PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, suing for wrong done the corporation of which he was a stockholder, of necessity brought his action in equity, which alone could afford him a remedy. (Brinckerhoff v. Bostwick, 105 N. Y. 567; O’Brien v. Fitzgerald, 143 id. 377, 382; Bookbinder v. Chase Nat. Bank of New York, 244 App. Div. 650.)

His action is a representative one, whether so stated or not. (Grant v. Greene Consolidated Copper Co., 169 App. Div. 206; affd., 223 N. Y. 655.) While plaintiff as a stockholder has the right to invoke the aid of a court of equity, any cause of action he might have is a derivative one and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Falk v. . HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Holmes v. CampAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  4. Hanover Fire Insurance v. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Grant v. Greene Consolidated Copper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gottfried v. GottfriedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  2. Liken v. ShafferDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1946
  3. State Ex Rel. Weede v. BechtelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  4. Chaplin v. SelznickNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Chance v. Guaranty Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API