Legal Opinion

Rojzenblitt v. Polish Trans-Atlantic Shipping Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 23, 1936Published

1Opinion of the CourtNoonan, J.

Plaintiff moves pursuant to Rules of Civil Practice, rule 104, to strike out the second and third affirmative defenses of the amended answer of the defendant on the ground that the same are sham and frivolous and insufficient in law.

In support of the motion the plaintiff has submitted several affidavits contending that affidavits may be used on this type of motion. The defendant has not presented any answering proof.

The action of the female plaintiff is based on a claim of personal injuries sustained while she was a passenger on the defendant’s vessel Batory. The complaint alleges that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davis v. Farmers Co-Operative Equity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Robinson v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Michigan Central Railroad v. MixSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Gregonis v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. TerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API