Legal Opinion

Zarada v. Board of Education

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1963PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph Liff, J.

The petitioner applies for an order directing the respondent Board of Education to reinstate the petitioner as a teacher for the third grade and directing the board to make the payments which would be due to her pursuant to the terms of her employment.

Her application is in the nature of a mandamus and in order to succeed she must show that the respondents has failed to perform a duty which it was required to do under law. The petitioner has failed to do so.

In June of 1962, the petitioner was engaged as a teacher of the third grade for the school year 1962-1963. In that capacity she was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kieval v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Giglio v. DunnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. Girard v. Board of Education of City School District of City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Brida v. AmbachNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Sherman v. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School DistrictNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  5. City School District of City of Elmira v. NewcombAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API