Williams v. Damico
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 176, Oct. T., 1920, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Delaware County, Sept. T., 1917, No. 223, on verdict for plaintiff in the case of Frank Williams v. Nicholas Damico. Trespass to recover damages for injuries to automobile. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Verdict for plaintiff for $565.80 and judgment thereon. Subsequently the defendant filed a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto and motion for new trial.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 176, Oct. T., 1920, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Delaware County, Sept. T., 1917, No. 223, on verdict for plaintiff in the case of Frank Williams v. Nicholas Damico. Trespass to recover damages for injuries to automobile. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Verdict for plaintiff for $565.80 and judgment thereon. Subsequently the defendant filed a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto and motion for new trial. The court filed an opinion dismissing the motion for a new trial, but did not dispose of the motion for judgment non obstante veredicto. Defendant…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The record in this case discloses that on February 4, 1920, a jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. On February 7th, the defendant filed a motion asking for judgment non obstante veredicto, and for a new trial, assigning five reasons therefor. On April 19, 1920, an opinion was filed in which the motion for a new trial was considered, and the rule for a new trial was dismissed. No order was made affecting the motion for judgment non obstante veredicto. On May 21,1920, judgment was entered on the verdict, and on May 22, 1920,- an appeal was taken to this court.
A judgment or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Yost v. DavisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- National Transit Co. v. United States Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
3Cited by1 opinion
- International Electronics Co. v. N. S. T. Metal Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950