Legal Opinion

United States v. Jac Natori Co.

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 14, 1995No. Court No. 90-08-00445Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion and Order

Aquilino, Judge:

The trial of this case brought by the government pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1582 to recover penalties and duties under 19 U.S.C. § 1592, though conducted by able attorneys, failed to focus completely the picture begun to develop during the pretrial stage and reflected in slip opinions of the court numbered 93-70,17 CIT 348, 821 F.Supp. 1514, and 93-201, 17 CIT 1126, 836 F.Supp. 889 (1993), familiarity with which is presumed. The consequences of this failure must be borne by the parties in the manner discussed hereinafter.

I

The few facts uncontested are set forth…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. BlumCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. Thorson Chemical Corp.United States Court of International Trade · 1992
  3. United States v. Jac Natori Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1993
  4. United States v. Modes, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1992
  5. United States v. Jac Natori Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API