Legal Opinion

Miller v. Continental Insurance Co. of New York

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 11, 1924No. 23,694PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Plaintiff, alleging that he was doing business under the name of J. A. Miller & Company, brought suit on a policy of fire insurance issued by defendant to “J. A. Miller & Co.” Defendant alleged that the policy had been canceled by mutual consent prior to the fire, and further alleged that the policy had not been issued to plaintiff individually, but to a copartnership doing business under the firm name of ‘J. A. Miller & Co.’ composed of plaintiff and his two sons Julius and Michael Miller.

The case has been tried twice. The first trial resulted in a verdict for defendant.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Thill v. FreiermuthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Miller v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Merchants & Farmers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Richard v. Western Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1958
  3. Miller v. American Ins. Co. of NewarkDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API