Legal Opinion
Claim of Ayers v. Hakes
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 29, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCardona, P. J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed August 28, 1997, which, inter alia, ruled that the insurance policy issued by Utica Mutual Insurance Company did not cover claimant’s injury.
During the summer of 1990, claimant developed problems with her hands while working as a horse groom. At the time, she was on the payroll of Painted Post Car Mart, a business owned by Gordon Hakes, which was engaged in buying and selling cars, trucks, recreational vehicles and trailers as well *976as horses and cattle. Claimant performed her horse grooming duties at a farm owned by Gordon…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Claim of Grefe v. Tractor Rentals, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Claim of Holmes v. Cornell UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Claim of Thomas v. DiamondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Claim of Vasquez v. Gotham HotelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cabrera v. Two-Three-Nought-Four AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Claim of Cacciatore v. AJ Hunter Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re Amy TT.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Claim of Thomson v. Brute Spring & Equipment, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005