Nado v. State of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—In a claim to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant State *398of New York appeals from an interlocutory judgment of the Court of Claims (Corbett, J.), dated May 27, 1994, which, after a nonjury trial on the issue of liability, found it 50% at fault and the claimant 50% at fault in the happening of the accident.
Ordered that the interlocutory judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The trial court’s conclusion that Elvira Nado’s fall was caused by her stepping into a hole in the curb, rather than by stepping off the curb, as the State suggests, was not against the weight of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vizzari v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Taran v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Skelly v. Village of Port ChesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Schock v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by3 opinions
- DiMaio v. PozefskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Kiett v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Shafarenko v. Fu ChengAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004