Legal Opinion

Nado v. State of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 31, 1995No. (Claim No. 76137.)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a claim to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant State *398of New York appeals from an interlocutory judgment of the Court of Claims (Corbett, J.), dated May 27, 1994, which, after a nonjury trial on the issue of liability, found it 50% at fault and the claimant 50% at fault in the happening of the accident.

Ordered that the interlocutory judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The trial court’s conclusion that Elvira Nado’s fall was caused by her stepping into a hole in the curb, rather than by stepping off the curb, as the State suggests, was not against the weight of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vizzari v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Taran v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Skelly v. Village of Port ChesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  4. Schock v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DiMaio v. PozefskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Kiett v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Shafarenko v. Fu ChengAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API