Tanner v. United States Steel Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Woodside, J.,
The question in this case is whether the claimant is entitled to Workmen’s Compensation benefits for total dependency or partial dependency.
At the time of the accident §307, sub-section 5 of The Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1915 as amended, 77 PS §561, provided that where deceased’s relatives are entitled to compensation and there is no widow, children or father, then the mother, if dependent to any extent upon the employe at the time of the accident shall receive 25% of wages, but not in excess of $9 per week and if the mother was totally dependent upon the deceased…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Feldman v. Pictorial Review—Women's World Publishing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Kloskowski Et Ux. v. Hudson Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Cardone v. JenningsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Uber v. Bobo & Bango Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Kloskowski v. Hudson Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thorn v. STRAWBRIDGE & CLOTHIERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Dindino v. Weekly Review Publishing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Iwaskewycz v. United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- DiCampli v. General Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Goodman v. University Shop, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.