Legal Opinion

Threlkeld v. Third Judicial District Court

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1932No. 3780PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Rehearing.

WATSON, J.

Our alternative writ of prohibition has stopped proceedings by respondent in the district court to condemn petitioner’s land for use as a logging railroad. To the petition for the alternative writ, respondent has demurred.

The Southwest Lumber Company showed in the district court that it is a private corporation engaged in lumbering and logging, and holding large contracts with the federal government and with the state for'the harvesting of timber, to reach which it desires to construct a spur from its existing logging railroad across petitioner’s lands; that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Clark v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Healy Lumber Co. v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Nash v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Potlatch Lumber Co. v. PetersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Hench v. PrittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kaiser Steel Corporation v. WS Ranch CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  2. W. S. Ranch Company, a New Mexico Corporation v. Kaiser Steel Corporation, a Nevada CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  3. Electro-Jet Tool & Manufacturing Co. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  4. SWEPI, LP v. Mora CountyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
  5. Santa Fe Southern Railway, Inc. v. Baucis Limited Liability Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API