Legal Opinion

Manuszewski v. Merchants Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 16, 1977PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Under any interpretation the allegations of the complaint seeking damages against the plaintiff clearly come within the exclusion of the policy. There exists no factual basis or legal theory which may be developed at trial arising out of this incident that would obligate the defendant insurance company to pay and, therefore, there is no duty to defend (Lionel Freedman, Inc. v Glen Falls Ins. Co., 27 NY2d 364; Vale v Yawarski, 79 Misc 2d 320; cf. International Paper Co. v Continental Cas. Co., 35 NY2d 322, 325). (Appeal from order of Erie…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. International Paper Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Lionel Freedman, Inc. v. Glens Falls InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Vale v. YawarskiNew York Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cole's Restaurant, Inc. v. North River InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. American Home Assurance Co. v. FirestoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. County of Monroe v. Travelers Insurance CompaniesNew York Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API