Legal Opinion

Aikens v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 3, 2019No. A166407Published

1Per curiam

*749*444Petitioner seeks judicial review pursuant to ORS 144.335 of a final order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision following a 2017 murder review hearing under ORS 163.105.1 In that order, the board determined that petitioner failed to prove that he was likely to be rehabilitated in a reasonable period of time and scheduled his next murder review hearing four years out. Petitioner contends that the board's determination regarding the likelihood of his rehabilitation is not supported by substantial evidence or substantial reason. On review of the record, we disagree. Petitioner…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morrison v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Aikens v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API