Legal Opinion

Susman Godfrey, L.L.P. v. Marshall

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided May 26, 1992No. 05-92-00854-CVPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Justice.

This is an original proceeding for mandamus. Relators seek writs of mandamus directing respondent to set aside his order imposing a monetary sanction of $25,000 on relators, jointly and severally. We deny both petitions for writ of mandamus.

THE LAWSUIT

Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas sued several defendants, including relator Collins, to collect about eighteen million dollars owed to it as the assignee of two promissory notes. Relator Susman Godfrey, L.L.P. represents Collins and other defendants. Relator Barry C. Barnett, one of Susman Godfrey’s attorneys, handled the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. Holloway v. Fifth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Finlay v. Olive, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  2. Electronic Data Systems Corp. v. Tyson, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  3. Onstad v. Wright, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  4. Trimble v. Itz, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
  5. Tjernagel v. Roberts, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API