Osburn v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentRobert L. Brown, Justice
The suppression of the 8:55 p.m. confession by the majority eviscerates the State’s case against Osburn, making a retrial a remote possibility. While I agree wholeheartedly that involuntary confessions must be suppressed under our basic constitutional principles, I take issue with the majority’s analysis in this case. I disagree that Osburn did not reinitiate contact with the police. I further disagree that Os-burn’s will was overborne by the police agents’ reference to his daughter, Holley, in an interrogation that took place four hours earlier. For these reasons, I would affirm.
a. Right to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. BayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- People v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. OliveraIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.