Legal Opinion

Estate of Hinds

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 8, 1897No. Appeal, No. 107PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal, No. 107, Oct. T., 1897, by ' plaintiff, from decree of O. C. Allegheny Co., June T., 1896, No. 132, to compel restoration of securities to minor’s estate. Petition to compel restoration of securities to minors’ estate. The petition of.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 107, Oct. T., 1897, by ' plaintiff, from decree of O. C. Allegheny Co., June T., 1896, No. 132, to compel restoration of securities to minor’s estate. Petition to compel restoration of securities to minors’ estate. The petition of. William Hinds alleged that his father, William Hinds, late of the county of Allegheny, died January 11, 1883, intestate, leaving to survive him a widow, Annie Hinds, and six minor children, namely, Martha (now of full age, and has been settled with by Thomas H. Chapman, guardian), William (petitioner), Jane, Nellie, Frank and George; that letters of…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

There is nothing in this record that requires a reversal or modification of the decree. The questions presented were carefully considered and correctly disposed of by the learned president of the orphans’ court. On Iris opinion the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Williams' EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. Three Keys Ltd. v. SR Utility Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  3. Lichtenfels v. North Carolina National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Hartje's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Alexander v. WindsorMontana Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API