Legal Opinion
Pratt v. Walther
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided December 9, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. James E. Withrow, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The plaintiffs filed the following petition in the.circuit court of the city of St. Louis at the June term, 1889, against Lillian M. Walther and W. K. Walther, her husband:
“Plaintiffs state that, at the dates hereinafter mentioned, and at the present time, they were, and now are, partners doing business in the city of St. Louis, under the firm name of Pratt, Simmons & Co.
“That the defendant Lillian M. Walther was, at the dates of the purchase of the goods hereinafter mentioned, • and up to May 1, 1889, doing business at city of St. Louis under the name of Mrs. W. K. Walther; that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Scovill v. GlasnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Fields v. MaloneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Lumpkin v. CollierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
- Brumback v. WeinsteinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
- Frank v. SiegelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bush v. BlockMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916
- Steele v. BrazierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
- State Ex Rel. Ely v. BandallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1927