Legal Opinion
Howland v. Borough of Freehold
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 11, 1976PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
143 N.J. Super. 484 (1976)
363 A.2d 913
JESSE A. HOWLAND & SONS, INC., T/A ALLIED TRANSIT MIX, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
THE BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND CHARLES NOVOTNY, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD; AND THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 5, 1976.
Decided August 11, 1976.
Before Judges FRITZ, SEIDMAN and MILMED.
Mr. Richard T. O'Connor argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Cerrato, O'Connor, Mehr & Saker, attorneys).
Mr.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jantausch v. Borough of VeronaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Gruber v. Mayor and Tp. Committee of Raritan Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Jantausch v. Borough of VeronaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Reinauer Realty Corp. v. Borough of ParamusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Roselle v. WrightSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Permanent Financial Corp. v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Township of Fairfield v. Likanchuk'sNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Trenkamp v. Township of BurlingtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- Hawrylo v. Board of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- LIMA PARTNERS v. Borough of NorthvaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.