Legal Opinion

Satterly v. United States

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided May 19, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 2527PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

C. G. NEESE, District Judge.

This is a motion by the movant, pro se, in custody under the sentence of this Court in United States of America, plaintiff v. James E. Satterly, Jr., defendant, criminal action no. 6797, this district and division, claiming that such sentence was in excess of the maximum authorized by law. 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Only a matter of law is presented, so the production of the prisoner before this Court is not required. Idem.

The motion and the files and records in the aforecited action show conclusively that the movant was sentenced on October 2,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Morris Wilbur Lee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  3. John Aldridge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. Clifford Laverne JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arnulfo Mieles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. CarmenDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API