Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bolden v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 18, 1925No. 6 Div. 407Published

1Dissent

In my original dissenting opinion I called special attention to the nature of the fraud charged in the bill of complaint. I wish now to present in parallel columns the case made by the bill, and the case which has been decided by this court:

The Bill. The Opinion.

"The said Mary Belle "Under the averments of Bolden, and a witness, the bill, taken as true on Elizabeth Caster, who demurrer, the very existence testified in said cause of the cause of action was on behalf of the plaintiff, simulated, a mere concoction, testified in open court on conceived with malus animus, the trial of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Waring v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. Keenum v. DodsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Quick v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Prince v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  5. Lester v. StroudSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API