Legal Opinion

Tchida v. Police Officers' Federation of Minneapolis

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 22, 1985No. C6-85-894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Appellant, police officer Rodney Tehida, appeals from a district court entry of judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The jury found that respondent, the Police Officers’ Federation of Minneapolis (Federation), breached a duty of fair representation and the jury awarded him approximately $20,000.00 in damages representing Tchida’s private attorney fees. The trial court then ruled that the verdict was not supported by the evidence, granted JNOV, and awarded the Federation $435.38 in costs.

Tehida appeals from the JNOV and the assessment of costs. We affirm.

FACTS

On February…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. William R. Freeman v. Local Union No. 135 Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Warehousemen and HelpersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Eisen v. State, Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lipka v. Minnesota School Employees Ass'n, Local 1980Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  2. Destache v. Independent School District No. 832Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Whipple v. Independent School District No. 621Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Lipka v. MINN. SCHOOL EMPLOY. ASS'N.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API