Tchida v. Police Officers' Federation of Minneapolis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellant, police officer Rodney Tehida, appeals from a district court entry of judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The jury found that respondent, the Police Officers’ Federation of Minneapolis (Federation), breached a duty of fair representation and the jury awarded him approximately $20,000.00 in damages representing Tchida’s private attorney fees. The trial court then ruled that the verdict was not supported by the evidence, granted JNOV, and awarded the Federation $435.38 in costs.
Tehida appeals from the JNOV and the assessment of costs. We affirm.
FACTS
On February…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- William R. Freeman v. Local Union No. 135 Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Warehousemen and HelpersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Eisen v. State, Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lipka v. Minnesota School Employees Ass'n, Local 1980Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Destache v. Independent School District No. 832Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Whipple v. Independent School District No. 621Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Lipka v. MINN. SCHOOL EMPLOY. ASS'N.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995