Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Yankton Sioux Tribe v. Gambler's Supply, Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided April 12, 1996No. Civ. 94-4201PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PIERSOL, District Judge.
The Yankton Sioux Tribe and Darrell E. Drapeau [hereinafter “the Tribe”] filed this qui tam action in the name of the United States against Gambler’s Supply, Inc., and other named defendants [hereinafter “Gambler’s Supply”] to recover monies paid under contracts relating to the management of the Fort Randall Casino which were never approved by the Secretary of the Interior. Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment, Doc. 13 & 20; Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Brief in Resistance to Defendants’ Motion for Summary…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Penobscot Indian Nation v. Key Bank of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- United States ex rel. Hall v. Tribal Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Yankton Sioux Tribe v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2007
- United States Ex. Rel. Crow Creek Sioux Tribe v. Hattum Family FarmsDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2000
- Coates v. KelleyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.