Legal Opinion

Fattorusso v. Urbanowicz

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COtiRT

J. Emmett Murphy, J.

*503Ordered that the motion is granted and the complaint is dismissed.

Plaintiffs commenced this action to rescind the purchase of a racehorse and for money damages under the following theories: breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraud based upon express representations, negligent misrepresentations, unjust enrichment, consumer fraud, breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty of merchantability and breach of implied warranty of fitness.

Plaintiff was the successful claimant of a harness racehorse at a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bittrolff v. Ho's Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Brodsky v. NerudAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fattorusso v. UrbanowiczNew York Supreme Court, Westchester County · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API