Legal Opinion

Kling v. Taylor-Morley, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 16, 1996No. 69229PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAHAN, Presiding Judge.

Defendant, Taylor-Morley (“Developer”) appeals an adverse judgment enjoining the construction of an office building and declaring its development to be in violation of a restrictive covenant enacted by prior owners of the property. We affirm.

At the core of this dispute is an agreement establishing a restrictive covenant allocating benefits and burdens to the properties along Questover Lane (“Lane”). At the time of the agreement’s inception, Lane was entirely a private roadway, lined with large single family dwellings. The covenant was adopted by the residents and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Lake Wauwanoka, Inc. v. SpainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Dierberg v. WillsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Kauffman v. RolingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Stolba v. VesciMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wildflower Community Ass'n v. RinderknechtMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Blackburn v. Habitat Development Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. BLUE RIDGE BANK AND TRUST CO. v. TrosenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Moore v. WeeksMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Blue Ridge Bank and Trust Co. v. TrosenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API