Legal Opinion

Adler v. Whitbeck

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1886Published

Error to the Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

1Opinion of the CourtMinshall, J.

The plaintiffs are persons engaged in the traffic in intoxicating liquors, and brought an action in the court of common pleas of Cuyahoga county, on behalf of themselves and others engaged in the same business, to restrain the treasurer of the county from collectingdhe assessments, etc., made upon the business of each of them as traffickers in intoxicating liquors, under the act of the general assembly passed May 14, 1886, entitled “ an act providing against the evils resulting from the traffic in intoxicating liquors”(83 Ohio L. 157). A temporary injunction having been allowed, an answer was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. McMillen v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Youngblood v. SextonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Chilvers v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1862

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API