Homan v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from the District Court of Tarrant. Tried below before the Hon. R. E. Beckham. The opinion sufficiently states the facts germane to the ruling. The appellant was convicted of bigamy, and a term of three years in the penitentiary was the punishment assessed against him.
1Opinion of the Court
White, Presiding Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment of conviction for bigamy. But two bills of exception appear of record, and upon these the errors complained of are assigned. These bills were saved to rulings of the court, first, in refusing defendant’s application for an attachment for a witness, and, secondly, the order of the court overruling defendant’s motion for a continuance.
Appellant was indicted on the seventeenth of September, 1886. On the twentieth of September, 1886, he made application to the judge of the district court, then in session, for an attachment for one J. F.…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Spencer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Brito v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Graham v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
- Bludworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.