Legal Opinion

Langenbach v. Schell

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 15, 1873PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Assumpsit against the defendant, a married woman, on a promissory note given by her; brought to the Superior Court in Litchfield County, and tried on the general issue closed to the court. The court made a finding of the facts and reserved the case for the advice of this court. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

It appears from the finding that the defendant, who is a married woman, in the month of February, 1870, purchased of one Adolph Libko a certain farm situated in the town of New Hartford, with a mill, dwelling-house, and other buildings thereon, and paid for the same with her own individual property and funds. The premises were not conveyed *225to her as her sole and separate estate, and her husband has in them a life interest. The farm and mill required improvements and repairs; and to make and pay for the same, the defendant made her promissory note for $637.50, on the 7th of April, 1870,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Corr's Appeal From CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
  2. Donovan's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874
  3. National Bank v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
  4. Smith v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API