Legal Opinion

Drake v. Haier US Appliance Solutions Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 20, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00939Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHARLES DRAKE, Case No. 23-cv-00939-AMO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 9 v. RECONSIDERATION 10 HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS Re: Dkt. No. 48 INC., 11 Defendant. 12 13 Before the Court is Plaintiff Charles Drake’s Motion for Reconsideration of Certain 14 Aspects of the Court’s Order on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. The matter is fully briefed and 15 suitable for decision without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-6. Having read the parties’ papers and 16 carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Ry. Co. v. CurrierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API